Allocation to periods and assets

Allocation to periods and assets Allocation to periods and assets – Many measurements in financial reporting involve allocations of costs and revenues to different accounting periods and different assets. These allocations inevitably include an element of arbitrariness and therefore subjectivity. Just to name a few obvious items:

  • Depreciation of fixed assets involves judgmental allocation decisions (See explanation below).
  • Where assets are bought for stock (or inventory) and subsequent resale, unless the cost of each one can be individually identified (or unless their purchase price never changes), calculation of a particular asset’s purchase price involves a judgmental allocation.
  • For measurements of discounted future liabilities, allocation to different accounting periods depends on the choice of an appropriate discount rate, which inevitably involves a significant element of judgment, especially in measuring pension liabilities and the long period it takes before these materialise into annuity payments. Allocation to periods and assets
  • Where businesses acquire assets jointly, as in a takeover, deciding how the acquisition price should be divided among the separable underlying net assets involves judgmental allocation decisions. Allocation to periods and assets
  • Allocation problems also arise from the attribution of a business’s outputs, whether measured in terms of money or service potential, to the individual assets that jointly produce them.

Depreciation involves more than one kind of fundamental problem. As already noted, it involves the problem of prediction because it requires assumptions about the future useful life of the asset being depreciated. However, even if we have perfect knowledge of the future, depreciation still involves judgmental decisions as to how the cost of the fixed asset will be allocated.

  • It could be allocated by period or by item produced by or with the asset.
  • Where it is allocated by period, there is a choice between allocating the cost:
    • evenly across periods (the straight line basis); Allocation to periods and assets
    • more heavily to earlier years (the reducing balance and sum of the digits bases); or
    • more heavily to later years (using an actuarial basis so as to achieve a constant rate of return).

Areas of subjectivity – Many subjectivities in historical cost arise from the fundamental problems of prediction and allocation to periods and assets – for example, in relation to depreciation, the cost of self-produced assets, estimates of recoverable amount, and liabilities for future costs.

Advocates of historical cost argue that, while these areas of subjectivity undeniably exist, for some of them, such as depreciation, there is a limit to how far historical cost can go wrong.

Depreciation involves more than one kind of fundamental problem. As already noted, it involves the problem of prediction because it requires assumptions about the future useful life of the asset being depreciated. However, even if we have perfect knowledge of the future, depreciation still involves judgemental decisions as to how the cost of the fixed asset will be allocated.

  • It could be allocated by period or by item produced by or with the asset.
  • Where it is allocated by period, there is a choice between allocating the cost:
    • evenly across periods (the straight line basis);
    • more heavily to earlier years (the reducing balance and sum of the digits bases); or
    • more heavily to later years (using an actuarial basis so as to achieve a constant rate of return).

Unfortunately, for many business assets and liabilities, items that are affected by one type of fundamental measurement problem are also affected by another. For example, calculating the depreciated historical cost of plant and machinery can involve significant subjectivity because predictions of the future are involved in estimating its remaining useful life and judgemental decisions have to be made on how its cost will be allocated; and subjective decisions that ignore problems of jointness may have to be taken in calculating recoverable amounts for particular assets.

But typically there are no active markets for second-hand plant and machinery, so current market prices would not provide an alternative source of objective measurement information. Indeed, some would argue that fixed assets generally provide the most difficult and pervasive practical problems in financial reporting measurement.

There are rational arguments in favor of each of these approaches, but the actual choice is a question of judgment.

Allocation to periods and assets

Annualreporting.info provides financial reporting narratives using IFRS keywords and terminology for free to students and others interested in financial reporting. The information provided on this website is for general information and educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Use at your own risk. Annualreporting.info is an independent website and it is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any other way associated with the IFRS Foundation. For official information concerning IFRS Standards, visit IFRS.org.

Leave a comment