Continuous assessment of control

Continuous assessment of control is part of documenting your consolidation routines. IFRS 10 clarifies that control over another entity is reassessed if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements control discussed in the definition of Control of an investee.

The principle of continuous assessment is broad. Put simply, a reassessment of control should be carried out whenever a change that could affect the outcome of the assessment takes place. This could naturally include a very wide variety of circumstances.

From a defensive point of view – document an annual review of this continuous assessment of control in your consolidation files.

Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control

Some examples of situations when a reassessment of control could or would be appropriate include:

  • changes to the investor’s decision-making rights Continuous assessment of control
  • lapse of decision-making rights held by other parties Continuous assessment of control
  • investor becomes or ceases to be entitled to variable returns Continuous assessment of control
  • changes resulting in reassessment of whether an investor acts as agent or principal.

One could also very well argue that reassessment may also be required when different investors have rights over activities that take place at different times (see Scenario 1 and 2). Continuous assessment of control

Protective rights and continuous assessment of control

In August 2012, the Committee received a request for clarification about IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. The submission related to protective rights and the effect of those rights on the power over the investee, more specifically in situations when those protective rights are exercised.

Something else -   Software as a service

The details of the example submitted were: Continuous assessment of control

  • The shares of an operating entity are all owned by one entity, the investor.
  • The operating entity enters into a loan arrangement with a bank that contains several covenants. If a covenant is breached, the bank has the right to veto major business decisions (considered to be the relevant activities of the operating entity) and to call in the loan. The bank’s rights are considered to be protective. The investor continues to consolidate the operating entity.
  • The entity breaches a covenant. What are the consolidation implications for the investor entity and for the bank? Who now controls the investee—the original investor or the bank?

The Staff noted that the submitter highlighted two interpretations could arise under IFRS 10:

  • View A — when protective rights become exercisable, there is a change in facts and circumstances and the control assessment should be reassessed in accordance with paragraph 8 of the Standard. The staff noted that they viewed this as the interpretation that the IASB intended.
  • View B — Protective rights can never affect an assessment of control. The Staff noted that IFRS 10 states that; (i) protective rights are designed to protect the interests of the holder without giving power and (ii) protective rights are defined in the Standard as not conferring power. This is the view that the submitter favoured and proposed.

The Staff noted that the submitter argued in view B that protective rights should never be assessed as part of the control assessment. The Staff noted that they did not support the view proposed by the submitter and did not think that this reflected the IASB’s intention in IFRS 10 and indeed contradicted key principles in the standard. The Staff argued against the submitter on three grounds:

  1. the need for continuous assessment;
  2. discussion of control and power in the standard; and
  3. the IASB’s intention.
Something else -   Overview IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

The Staff asked the Committee whether they agreed with their recommendation not to add the topic to the Committee’s agenda.

After a detailed discussion, the Chairman summarised the issues. He noted that the assessment should be continuous. He noted that when a “trigger” occurred then this would change the basis upon which one would either include or exclude rights from the continuous assessment.

He noted that this may mean that certain rights may now be included in the assessment of control that may not have previously been considered. He noted that this should be the principle that underpins the future agenda decision.

He noted also that a protective right could change over time and should be considered in the reassessment of control. No vote was held and no decisions were taken in this Committee meeting.

In the May 2013 meeting, Staff provided a draft agenda notice, based on the discussions held during the previous meeting. The Committee approved the agenda decision (as modified by drafting comments).

In the September 2013 meeting, Staff discussed three comment letters they received since the May 2013 meeting and noted two respondents agreed with the Committee’s decision whilst one agreed but recommended that the agenda decision should not refer to the Board’s redeliberations, because the agenda paper that is referred to in the decision does not form part of the Board’s authoritative literature.

Staff disagreed with this because they believe the clarification of the Board’s intention, as contained in that agenda paper is useful. The second suggestion was that the agenda decision should make it clear that a reassessment may, or may not, result in a conclusion that control has changed.

Something else -   IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements quick overview

Staff considered the two suggestions and recommended confirming the tentative agenda decision as worded in May 2013 IFRIC update but with the inclusion of an additional sentence related to the second recommendation from the respondent.

The full text of the tentative agenda decision was presented to the Committee. The Committee agreed with staff’s recommendation and agreed with the amended wording for the tentative agenda decision. There was one comment about facts and circumstances changing and the member suggested restating this precise sentence as it is stated in IFRS 10.

Continuous assessment of control

Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control


Annualreporting provides financial reporting narratives using IFRS keywords and terminology for free to students and others interested in financial reporting. The information provided on this website is for general information and educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Use at your own risk. Annualreporting is an independent website and it is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any other way associated with the IFRS Foundation. For official information concerning IFRS Standards, visit or the local representative in your jurisdiction.

Something else -   Securitisation in 1 Best Complete Reading

Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control Continuous assessment of control

Leave a comment