Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset presents the explanation of what a credit-impaired financial asset is, how to account for a credit-impaired asset as long as it is credit-impaired and how to account for a credit-impaired asset that is no longer credit-impaired (i.e. curing of a credit-impaired financial asset which means the borrower has, for example, restructured its business and cash flow recovered sufficiently to return paying all interest and principal as per the original contract). Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of that financial asset have occurred. Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired include observable data about the following events:
the significant financial difficulty of the issuer or the borrower; Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
a breach of contract, such as a default or past due event; Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
the lender(s) of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession(s) that the lender(s) would not otherwise consider;
it is becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation;
the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or
the purchase or origination of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses.
It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event—instead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
Accounting for interest revenue while credit-impaired
When a financial asset becomes credit-impaired, IFRS 9 5.4.1(b) requires an entity to calculate interest revenue by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost of the financial asset, i.e. the (original) gross amount less expected credit losses. This results in a difference between (a) the interest that would be calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the gross carrying amount of the credit-impaired financial asset, and (b) the interest revenue recognised for that asset. Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
If a financial asset ‘cures’, so that it is transferred back to stage 2 or stage 1, interest revenue would once again be recognised based on the gross carrying amount. As a result, an entity recognises the adjustment required to bring the loss allowance to the amount required to be recognised in accordance with IFRS 9 as a reversal of expected credit losses ECLs in profit or loss [IFRS 9 5.5.8].
Reversal loss allowance
The allowance would be reversed to zero if the asset is recovered in full. The amount of this adjustment includes the effect of the unwinding of the discount on the loss allowance during the period that the financial asset was credit impaired. Ultimately, the reversal of impairment losses may exceed the impairment losses recognised in profit or loss over the life of the asset if amounts collected exceed the expected cash flow losses. Curing of a credit-impaired financial asset
The case of curing a credit-impaired financial asset
An existing loan with an effective interest rate of 10% has become credit-impaired. Lifetime expected credit losses have been recognised on the loan as of 1 January Year 20×1.
The expected shortfall in cash flows is shown in Table 1 and remain unchanged until 31 December N+3. Discounted at the effective interest rate (EIR) this gives an expected credit loss (ECL) as at 1 January of CU59,000, as shown in Table 1.
For illustrative purposes, assume that the contractual cash flows (principal + accrued interest) are fully recovered, unexpectedly, on 31 December 20×4.
For simplification purposes, interest is not accrued on unpaid interest.
As the loan is credit impaired, interest revenue is restricted to the amount derived from applying the EIR to the amortised cost of the loan. The Interpretations Committee’s decision clarifies that the reversal of the ECL allowance is recognised in full in the impairment expense line. The impact of this on a cumulative basis is that some of the effective interest on the gross carrying amount of the loan (CU40,000) is not presented as interest revenue, but rather, as a reversal of impairment. This is the portion (CU21,000) which represents the unwinding of discount on the ECL provision while the loan was credit impaired.
As a result the settlement in 20×4 is regularly recorded as follows:
Annualreporting.info provides financial reporting narratives using IFRS keywords and terminology for free to students and others interested in financial reporting. The information provided on this website is for general information and educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Use at your own risk. Annualreporting.info is an independent website and it is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any other way associated with the IFRS Foundation. For official information concerning IFRS Standards, visit IFRS.org.
NOTICE regarding use of cookies: We have updated our Privacy Policy to reflect our use of cookies to collect and process data, or to enhance the user experience. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the placement of these cookies and to similar technologies as described in the Privacy Policy. Find out more.