Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial – Unfortunately disputes may arise between an entity and a third party, employee, manager, director and these disputes may result in legal action being entered into between the parties. The issue giving rise to the provision (or contingent liability) might not have reached the legal stage, but making disclosures as required in IAS 37 sub 92 (see below) on the subject matter of the dispute might seriously prejudice the position of the reporting entity involved in the dispute. A court caseDisclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

As said in IAS 37 sub 92, these instances are expected to be quite rare, but when they do arise, IFRS does not require a comprehensive disclosure required by the accounting standards to be made. Instead limited disclosures are included in the financial statements. Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

In terms of prejudicial disclosures, IFRS does acknowledge that the prejudicial disclosures exemption is only to be applied in rare situations. This is to stop reporting entities from deliberately concealing details concerning provisions or contingent liabilities and hence in some cases it might be necessary to obtain confirmation from the reporting entity’s legal advisors as to whether or not disclosures required by IFRS would be prejudicial.

For reference IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Liabilities sub 92: Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

In extremely rare cases, disclosure of some or all of the information required as disclosures regarding Provisions, Contingent liabilities or Contingent assets can be expected to prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a dispute with other parties on the subject matter of the provision, contingent liability or contingent asset. In such cases, an entity need not disclose this information (re disclosures regarding Provisions, Contingent liabilities or Contingent assets), but shall disclose the general nature of the dispute, together with the fact that, and reason why, the information has not been disclosed.

IAS 37 92 describes the circumstances in which this disclosure exemption may be invoked as ‘extremely rare’, there are in practice a variety of situations where an entity is undergoing a process of negotiation and may wish to take advantage of the ability to conceal its negotiating stance. The ground rules for using this exemption are:

  • It is not an exemption from recognising a provision, but an exemption from disclosing the amount of the provision. In practice, this is achieved by combining the provision with another balance in the statement of financial position. In order not to mislead users of the financial statements, it is necessary to indicate which other balance is affected.
  • Where a provision is subject to reimbursement, and that reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset, then the prejudicial disclosure exemption may extend to that asset, again subject to disclosure of which asset balance is affected.
  • Disclosure that the exemption has been used is required, together with the minimum disclosures required by FRS 102 as amended in July 2015.
  • Once the dispute has been resolved, the exemption is no longer valid, and disclosure of the resolved position should be sufficient to give a true and fair view of the financial statements. This need to give a true and fair view exists regardless of legal undertakings to maintain confidentiality.
Something else -   Natural disasters Insurance recoveries and reimbursements

See also below an excerpt of the Vodafone Annual Report 2018 ‘Contingent liabilities and legal proceedings’ of a consumer claim, most of the other cases mentioned here were with other businesses, governmental units  or countries. Also look at the description ‘potential future cash outflows, where the likelihood of payment is considered remote, but is not considered probable or cannot be measured reliably’.

Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

General model of measurement of insurance contracts

Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial Disclosure when information is seriously prejudicial

Annualreporting provides financial reporting narratives using IFRS keywords and terminology for free to students and others interested in financial reporting. The information provided on this website is for general information and educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Use at your own risk. Annualreporting is an independent website and it is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any other way associated with the IFRS Foundation. For official information concerning IFRS Standards, visit IFRS.org or the local representative in your jurisdiction.

Something else -   The way to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Leave a comment