Initial measurement Financial instruments
IFRS 9 requires an entity to recognise a financial asset or liability on its balance sheet only when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Under IFRS 9 the requirements, on initial recognition, are that financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at (IFRS 9.5.1.1):
IFRS 9 classes | Fair value | Fair value plus eligible transaction costs |
Amortised cost | √ | |
Fair value through other comprehensive income | √ | |
Fair value though profit or loss | √ |
IFRS 9 retained the guidance from IAS 39 that – the best evidence of fair value at initial recognition is normally the transaction price – i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received for the financial instrument. (IFRS 9.5.1.1A, IFRS 9.B5.1.2A)
However, if this is not the case, any difference is accounted for in accordance with the substance of the transaction. If there is a difference between the entity’s estimate of fair value at initial recognition and the transaction price, then:
- if the estimate of fair value uses only data from observable markets, then the difference is recognised in profit or loss; or
- in all other cases, the difference is deferred as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the financial instrument.
The ‘which’ and ‘how’ of fair value measurement
In terms of where to start in the determination of fair value, it is useful to consider three broad steps that should be taken before delving into the details that inevitably will follow. These steps are important in illustrating the relationship between the primary IFRS that dictates when fair value measurement is required and IFRS 13 which is the “how” IFRS.
Step 1: |
Identify the balance or transaction (group of balances or transactions) ‘which’ must (may) be measured or disclosed at fair value and when such measurement (disclosure) is necessary. |
Step 2: |
Consult IFRS 13 for guidance on how to determine fair value upon initial recognition (see below). |
Step 3: |
Consult the ‘when’ IFRS to determine if the subsequent measurement of the account balance is at fair value and/or if fair value disclosures are required. |
Trade receivables
IFRS 9 requires trade receivables that do not have a significant financing component to be initially recognised at their transaction price (as defined in IFRS 15 – i.e. the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled), rather than at fair value. (IFRS 9.5.1.3, IFRS 15.60-65)
Whether a trade receivable has a ‘significant financing component’ is determined in accordance with the guidance in IFRS 15 on assessing whether a contract contains a significant financing component. IFRS 15 states that a contract contains a significant financing component if the timing of payments agreed to by the parties provides the customer or the entity with a significant benefit of financing the transfer of goods or services to the customer. IFRS 15 includes the following examples of factors to consider when assessing whether a contract contains a significant financing component: (IFRS 15.60-62)
- the difference, if any, between the amount of promised consideration and the cash selling price of the promised goods or services; and
- the combined effect of both:
Food for thought – Measuring trade receivables on initial recognition |
Trade receivables without a significant financing component (IFRS 13.BC138A) In many cases, the measurement on initial recognition for trade receivables without a significant financing component based on the transaction price guidance in IFRS 15 is unlikely to be significantly different from that currently applied under IAS 39. This is because the IASB has indicated that an entity can measure short-term receivables and payables with no stated interest rate at their invoiced amounts without discounting when the effect of not discounting is immaterial. Trade receivables with a significant financing component (IFRS 15.108) IFRS 9 does not exempt a trade receivable with a significant financing component from being measured at fair value on initial recognition. Therefore, differences may arise between the initial amount of revenue recognised in accordance with IFRS 15 – which is measured at the transaction price as defined in IFRS 15 – and the fair value of the trade receivable recognised at the date of initial recognition. Any difference between the measurement of the receivable in accordance with IFRS 9 and the corresponding amount of revenue recognised is presented as an expense. Impact of the practical expedient in IFRS 15 (IFRS 15.63, IFRS 9.BC235) As a practical expedient, IFRS 15 does not require an entity to adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if the entity expects, at contract inception, that the period between the entity transferring a promised good or service to the customer and the customer paying for that good or service is one year or less (see Simplified approach for trade and lease receivable and contract assets). IFRS 9 does not state that a trade receivable with a significant financing component to which this practical expedient is applied may be initially measured at an amount equal to the undiscounted amount of consideration recognised as revenue under IFRS 15 (in the same way as a trade receivable without a significant financing component) rather than at fair value. |
Measurement of fair value
– Definition of fair value (IFRS 13)
Fair Value: The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. |
|||
Price The price is determined at measurement date under current market conditions (i.e. an exit price). This is regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique. |
Asset or liability Fair value considers specific characteristics:
|
Transaction Is assumed to takes place either in:
|
Market participants Fair value of an asset or liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability (assuming they act in their own economic best interest) Market participants do not need to be identified. |
Food for thought – Market |
|
Food for thought – Market participant assumptions |
A fair value measurement under IFRS 13 requires an entity to consider the assumptions a market participant, acting in their economic best interest, would use when pricing the asset or a liability. Market participants are defined as having the following characteristics:
In addition, consider these considerations
|
Fair value of offsetting market risk or counterparty credit risk for groups of financial assets and financial liabilities
An entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities is exposed to:
- Market risks
- (Credit risk of each of the counterparties.
If these are managed on either a market risk or a credit risk net exposure basis:
- The entity is permitted to apply an exception (‘offsetting exemption’) to IFRS 13 for measuring fair value. Fair value would be based on the price:
- Received to sell a net long position (i.e. an asset) for a particular risk exposure, or
- To transfer a net short position (i.e. a liability) for a particular risk exposure in an orderly transaction between market participants.
Fair value of this ‘offset group’ of financial assets and financial liabilities is made consistently with how market participants would price the net risk exposure.
– Offsetting exemption
This exemption can only be used if the entity does all the following:
- Manages the offset group on the basis of net exposure to a particular market risk (or risks) or to the credit risk of a particular counterparty in accordance with the entity’s documented risk management or investment strategy.
- Provides information on that basis about the offset group to the entity’s key management personnel, as defined in IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures.
- Is required (or has elected) to measure the offset group at fair value in the statement of financial position at the end of each reporting period.
The exception does not relate to presentation.
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors must be applied when using the offsetting exception.
– Fair value of offset groups with…
Exposure to market risk |
Exposure to counterparty credit risk |
When using the offsetting exception: – Apply the price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value in the circumstances to the entity’s net exposure to those market risks – Ensure that the market risk (or risks) within the offset group are substantially the same:
|
When using the offsetting exception: – Include the effect of the entity’s net exposure to the credit risk of that counter party’s net exposure to the credit risk of the entity in the fair value measurement when market participants would take into account any existing arrangements that mitigate credit risk exposure in the event of default. Fair value is required to reflect market participants’ expectations about the likelihood that such an arrangement would be legally enforceable in the event of default. |
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
– Fair value at initial recognition
The transaction price is the price paid / received to acquire an asset or to assume a liability (i.e. entry price).
In contrast, fair value is the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (i.e. exit price).
However, in many cases the transaction price will equal the fair value – however it is still necessary to take into account factors specific to the transaction and to the asset or liability.
For example, the transaction price might not represent the fair value of an asset or a liability at initial recognition if any of the following conditions exist:
|
Fair value hierarchy
IFRS 13 includes a fair value hierarchy that categorises the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (input) levels:
-
Level 1: Observable inputs are quoted (unadjusted) prices, that are determined using market data, such as publicly available information about actual identical events or transactions, and that reflect the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability in active markets. An entity shall not make adjustments to quoted prices, only under specific circumstances, for example when a quoted price does not represent the fair value (i.e. when a significant event takes place between the measurement date and market closing date).
-
Level 2: Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Adjustments to Level 2 inputs will vary depending on factors specific to the asset or liability.
Level 2 inputs include the following:
-
- quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
- quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
- inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, for example:
- interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals;
- implied volatilities; and
- credit spreads.
- market-corroborated inputs.
-
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are inputs for which market data are not available and that are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. An entity shall use Level 3 inputs to measure fair value only when relevant observable inputs are not available.
The level of an accounting/reporting item values at fair value is based on its lowest input level (i.e. many times valuation techniques use level 1, level 2 and level 3 inputs, as a result of which the complete accounting/reporting item is considered to be valued at Level 3).
Recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements
IFRS 13 requires specific disclosures based on whether fair value measurement is recurring or non-recurring.
Recurring fair value measurements and Non-recurring fair value measurements are not defined in IFRS 13.
However, in general:
- Recurring fair value measurements: Fair value measurement is required at reporting date by other IFRSs (e.g. investment property, biological assets etc.)
- Non-recurring fair value measurements: Fair value measurement is triggered by particular events/circumstances (e.g. assets held for sale under IFRS 5 etc.).
Disclosure requirement |
Recurring fair value measurements |
Non-recurring fair value measurements |
Items not valued at fair value requiring disclosure of fair value |
Fair value at reporting date |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
|
Reasons for fair value measurement |
Ѵ |
||
Fair value hierarchy level i.e. Level 1, 2, or 3 |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Transfers between Level 1 and 2 (including reasons for the transfer and the entity’s policy for transfer) |
Ѵ |
||
Valuation technique, inputs, changes, reasons for change etc. – Level 2 and 3 |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Level 3 valuation processes /policies |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
|
Level 3 reconciliation of total gains or losses in P&L and OCI, purchases, sales issues, settlements, and transfers |
Ѵ |
||
Level 3 unrealised gains /losses recognised in P&L |
Ѵ |
||
Level 3 sensitivity to changes in unobservable inputs (Qualitative for non-financial instruments, quantitative for financial instruments) |
Ѵ |
||
Reasons if highest and best use (non-financial assets) differs from current use |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Ѵ |
Items not valued at fair value requiring disclosure of fair value refers to items that are measured and included in the Financial position on a basis other than fair value, but where disclosure is required of the fair value of these financial assets and financial liabilities. |
Unit of account
The determination of the unit of account must be established prior to determining fair value and is defined as the level at which an asset or a liability is aggregated or disaggregated in an IFRS for recognition purposes.
The unit of account is determined under the IFRS applicable to the asset or liability (or group of assets and liabilities) that requires fair value measurement.
Food for thought – Unit of account |
The item for which fair value is determined may be a single asset or liability such as a derivative instrument or a share in a publicly traded entity or it may be a group of assets (i.e. a portfolio of receivables), group of liabilities (i.e. a portfolio of deposits) or group of assets and liabilities (e.g. a cash-generating unit, a business or an asset group which is held for sale). IFRS 13 does not generally provide specific guidance on the determination of the unit of the account – rather it directs preparers to other IFRSs to make this determination. IFRS 13 does specifically address one area relating to the unit of account in the form of guidance for financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions. Here IFRS 13 includes a “portfolio exception” allowing a specified level of grouping when a portfolio of financial assets and financial liabilities are managed together with offsetting markets risks or counterparty credit risk. This exception is subject to your entity meeting certain eligibility criteria. (IFRS 13.48-52). |
Valuation techniques
An entity shall use valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
Changes in the valuation technique or its application are accounted for as a change in accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8.
Inputs to valuation techniques
- IFRS 13 is clear that the valuation technique your entity uses must maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. For example, if a quoted price is available for a specific asset, this price must be used instead of an entity-specific assumption about the price.
- If an asset/liability measured at fair value has both a bid and ask price, the price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value is used – regardless of where the input is categorised within the fair value hierarchy.
- Further, there is a direct correlation between the level of disclosures required and the level of unobservable inputs – the more the degree of unobservable data used in your valuation technique, the more the degree of disclosure that you must include in your financial statements.
- A change in a valuation technique can be made but only if the change results in a measurement that is equally or more representative of fair value. Any such change, where justified, is considered to be a change in estimate (IFRS 13.66).
IFRS 13 requires entities to apply valuation techniques consistent with any of the following three methods:
- Market approach – uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (i.e. similar) assets, liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities, such as a business
- Cost approach – reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service capacity of an asset (often referred to as current replacement cost).
- Income approach – converts future amounts (e.g. cash flows or income and expenses) to a single current (i.e. discounted) amount. The fair value measurement is determined on the basis of the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.
Valuation techniques should be applied consistently from one period to the next.
If the transaction price is fair value at initial recognition and a valuation technique that uses unobservable inputs will be used to measure fair value in subsequent periods, the valuation technique shall be calibrated so that at initial recognition the result of the valuation technique equals the transaction price.
Annualreporting provides financial reporting narratives using IFRS keywords and terminology for free to students and others interested in financial reporting. The information provided on this website is for general information and educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Use at your own risk. Annualreporting is an independent website and it is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any other way associated with the IFRS Foundation. For official information concerning IFRS Standards, visit IFRS.org or the local representative in your jurisdiction.
Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments
Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments Initial measurement financial instruments