What happened in the reporting period

What happened in the reporting period

There is no requirement to disclose a summary of significant events and transactions that have affected the company’s financial position and performance during the period under review (or simply what happened in the reporting period). However, information such as this could help readers understand the entity’s performance and any changes to the entity’s financial position during the year and make it easier finding the relevant information. However, information such as this could also be provided in the (unaudited) operating and financial review rather than the (audited) notes to the financial statements.

Covid-19
At the time of writing, the biggest impact on the financial statements of entities all around the world is related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most entities will be affected by this in one form or another and should discuss the impact prominently in their financial statements. However, as the events are still unfolding, this publication is not providing any illustrative examples or guidance. See how to account for Covid-19 to get an up-to-date discussion.

Going concern disclosures [IAS1.25]
When preparing financial statements, management shall make an assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Financial statements shall be prepared on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Read more

IFRS 10 Special control approach

IFRS 10 Special control approach

– determines which entities are consolidated in a parent’s financial statements and therefore affects a group’s reported results, cash flows and financial position – and the activities that are ‘on’ and ‘off’ the group’s balance sheet. Under IFRS, this control assessment is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated financial statements’.

Some of the challenges of applying the IFRS 10 Special control approach include:

  • identifying the investee’s returns, which in turn involves identifying its assets and liabilities. This may appear straightforward but complications arise when the legal ownership of assets diverges from the accounting depiction (for example, in financial asset transfers that ‘fail’ de-recognition, and in finance leases). In general, the assessment of the investee’s assets and returns should be consistent with the accounting depiction in accordance with IFRS
  • it may not always be clear whether contracts and other arrangements between an investor and an investee
    • create rights or exposure to a variable return from the investee’s performance for the investor; or
    • transfer risk or variability from the investor to the investee IFRS 10 Special control approach
  • the relevant activities of an SPE may not be obvious, especially when its activities have been narrowly specified in its purpose and design IFRS 10 Special control approach
  • the rights to direct those activities might also be difficult to identify, because for example, they arise only in particular circumstances or from contracts that are outside the legal boundary of the SPE (but closely related to its activities).

IFRS 10 Special control approach sets out requirements for how to apply the control principle in less straight forward circumstances, which are detailed below:  IFRS 10 Special control approach

  • when voting rights or similar rights give an investor power, including situations where the investor holds less than a majority of voting rights and in circumstances involving potential voting rights
  • when an investee is designed so that voting rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the investee, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual arrangements IFRS 10 Special control approach
  • involving agency relationships IFRS 10 Special control approach
  • when the investor has control only over specified assets of an investee
  • franchises. IFRS 10 Special control approach

Read more

Some challenges in measurement bases for best 1 in quality IFRS reporting

Some challenges in measurement bases

for best 1 in quality IFRS reporting

– When applied to financial reporting the term measurement can give a misleading Some challenges in measurement basesimpression of certainty and objectivity. In daily life, measurements are typically made of the physical characteristics of physical objects – such as height, weight, temperature and so on. If accurate measurement tools are employed, information of this sort is objective and uncontroversial (a ‘fact’). The subjects of measurement in financial reporting, however, are abstract concepts of uncertain meaning such as income and net assets (an ‘estimate’).

For this reason alone, their measurement is always liable to be controversial.

All measurements in financial reporting are expressed in monetary terms and therefore purport to be measurements of value. However, value can mean different things. A particular asset might be valued at, for example, its historical cost, its replacement cost or its market value. It cannot be said that any one of these measurements is the one and only correct value for the asset. Each value, if the measurement is made properly, will be correct on the basis being used. In the conceptual framework, the financial reporting standard-setters refer to the different attributes of assets and liabilities, which give different values when measured. Historical cost, replacement cost and market value are all attributes in this sense.

The diversity of the purposes for which financial reporting information is used means that a basis of measurement appropriate for one purpose may not be appropriate for all other purposes. If you ask someone the question, ‘What is this company’s income?’, the reply ‘Why do you want to know?’ may be a sensible first step towards providing a useful answer. There is no single, right answer to the question. Some challenges in measurement bases

As said before financial reporting measurements are inherently a matter of judgment, subjectivity and convention. Measurements of transactions for financial reporting that are affected by one or more of these fundamental problems when one measurement technique is used may well be faced by another fundamental problem if an alternative technique is tried. For such items there is no escape from subjectivity in measurement.

Read more

IAS 36 Determine if and when to test for impairment

IAS 36 Determine if and when to test for impairment – When looking at the step-by-step IAS 36 impairment approach it comes down to the following broadly organised steps:

  • What?? – Determining the scope and structure of the impairment review (see the step-by-step IAS 36 impairment approach),
  • If and when? – Determining if and when a quantitative impairment test is necessary (discussed on this page),
  • How? – Understanding the mechanics of the impairment test and how to recognise or reverse any impairment loss, if necessary (see IAS 36 Impairment test – How?).

Step 3: IAS 36 Determine if and when to test for impairment

IAS 36 requires an entity to a perform a quantified … Read more

Fair value measurement

Fair Value Measurement can present significant challenges for preparers of financial statements, particularly because it involves using judgment and estimation. Further, it is the market participant view that shapes fair value, so preparers need to monitor whether the valuation models and assumptions they use for financial reporting appropriately reflect those of market participants.

Fair Value Measurement under IFRS 13:Fair value measurement

  1. defines fair value;
  2. sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value; and
  3. requires disclosures about fair value measurements.

The definition of fair value focuses on assets and liabilities because they are a primary subject of accounting measurement. In addition, IFRS 13 is applied to an entity’s own equity instruments measured at fair value.

The … Read more

What is replicating portfolios?

So, what is replicating portfolios? Topic – IFRS 17 Insurance contracts. A replicating portfolio is a pool of assets designed to reproduce (replicate) the cash flows or market values of a pool of liabilities across a large number of stochastic scenarios used among other in the insurance industry. Once set up, a replicating portfolio can be used to predict the behavior or change in value of the liabilities across a range of other economic conditions. What is replicating portfolios

Definition of replicating portfolios

A replicating portfolio is a proxy portfolio consisting of standard capital-market products that replicate the scenario-dependent payoffs of the insurance company’s liability. It is determined across a wide selection of calibration scenarios by optimisation techniques. Because Read more

IFRS 13 Relief from royalty method

IFRS 13 Relief from royalty methodIFRS 13 Relief from royalty method – The ‘Royalty Relief’ (also known as Relief from Royalty) method is based on the notion that a brand holding company owns the brand and licenses it to an operating company.  One method to determine the market value of Intellectual Property assets like patents, trademarks, and copyrights is to use Relief from royalty method (also known as Royalty avoidance approach or Royalty Relief approach). This approach determines the value of Intellectual Property assets by estimating what it would cost the business if it had to purchase the Intellectual Property (IP) it uses from an outsider. Other valuation methods are provide here.

This approach requires the valuator to

  1. project future sales of the products
Read more

How is goodwill different from other intangible assets?

How is goodwill different from other intangible assets????

An asset, which has no physical existence such as corporate intellectual properties (patents, trademarks, business methodologies and copyrights), trademarks, patents, software, goodwill and brand recognition are known to be an “Intangible asset”. So goodwill is and is not an intangible asset. Goodwill is a residual, unidentifiable, not separable asset. Intangibles are not that but…. How is goodwill different from other intangible assets

Separate identifiable intangible assets acquired

That is because identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognised separately from goodwill [IFRS 3 B31]. An intangible asset is ‘identifiable’ if it arises from contractual or other legal rights or if it is separable [IAS 38 12]. Under certain criteria also … Read more